Sunday, 5 June 2016

Consumption and Cruelty

As my last blog entry, I wanted to use this post to sum-up the ideas of the class and my learnings over the semester. But, after seeing this video, I had to share this first. 

\
Source: Sante Nature Innovation 2014, Sans un mot cette video vous rend muet en 6min, Facebook page, 11 April 2014, accessed 3 June 2016, <https://www.facebook.com/554178414627483/videos/741072019271454/>.

In his post, John Voss, former architect now artist whom shared this video, accompanied it with only three words: "faster cheaper more". For me, this perfect summation of what the horror witnessed in this video represents, was just as powerful as the video itself. The suffering experienced by these animals to increase the efficiency of production - fitting more animals in less space, feeding them minimally, processing them alive - all to save a few hours and dollars. And while we may not advocate or even be able to control the conditions these animals have to endure, the possibly even more unnerving scale of production hits home because it is to feed our gross over-consumption. 

We are consumers. Consumers of resources, Consumers of money, Consumers of food. And it's not only bad for our planet, but its bad for ourselves and yet we do it anyway. The discussion on food waste in last week's lecture detailed the environmental impacts of clearing land and the disposal of waste. But we did not touch on the implications of wasting animal products. Animal cruelty as a byproduct of gross consumerism and food waste is a powerful message. Source locally. Only take what we need. Manage waste responsibly. 

To Sum Up

It's difficult to sum up this blog across ideas of population growth, urban planning and smart cities next to climate change and resilience and sustainable behaviours, education and waste management. It's been a rollercoaster of debate over the place of technology in the future of our cities and the role of governments, professionals and individuals in the sustainability movement. City-based solutions to global issues are diverse and sometimes conflicting but there is one message that seems to shine through all of this. When managing sustainability and urbanisation in cities, no matter the tool, the intent must be good and true. This seems obvious but a growing preoccupation with economic outcomes is clear in so many of these articles and videos and it deters from social and environmental objectives, without which, sustainability cannot be achieved. 

Wednesday, 1 June 2016

Vivid Festival Sydney

Source: 7 News Sydney 2016, Facebook page, 31 May 2016, accessed 2 June 2016, <https://www.facebook.com/7newssydney/?fref=nf>.

It's that time of the year again. Sydney's Vivid Festival, the world's largest festival of light, music and ideas, wows us and over 1 million of our fellow residents as well as more than 100,000 tourists visiting specifically for the event, with an spectacular show of colour and innovation.

Although I've taken part in the event for years now and often pondered those enormous energy bills, for the first time I've stopped to truly consider the environmental ramifications of such an immense use of electricity. It is the participation of strong sustainability body, Taronga Zoo in the annual light show for the first time that really got me to thinking. How can an organisation working to promote sustainability support such a blatant waste of energy. So I dug a little deeper.

Vivid Sydney (2015) address just how much consideration has been put into the environmental ramifications of the festival. In addition to most installations comprising energy efficient LED globes, Vivid is powered by 100 per cent GreenPower accredited renewable energy. This means that all the power used by installations is offset through an equivalent purchase of renewable energy, essentially an investment in the renewable energy industry. 

Whether Vivid Festival Sydney is entirely powered by renewable energy or not, the educational benefits arguably outweigh the direct environmental repercussions. Sustainable thinking is woven throughout the displays whether they feature innovative ideas for smart cities, low-energy installations or straight-forward sustainability education. Taronga Zoo's own installation promotes education and fundraising for endangered species. Certainly, the economic benefits of the tourism aspect trump the financial energy cost. As long as sustainability remains at the heart of this incredible festival, the long-term outcomes will include positive social, environmental and economic benefits for Sydney.

Source: Vivid Sydney 2015, Vivid Sydney 2015 Lights up with GreenPower, NSW Government, 20 May 2015, accessed 2 June 2016, <http://www.vividsydney.com/sites/default/files/20150520-MR-vivid-sydney-2015-lights-up-with-greenpower_0.pdf>.